Social Security, RMDs, Medicare and Roth room. No client needed.
Returns are read here and never uploaded. Clients and plans are saved on this computer. No outside connections.
Version Oct 30, 2026 · 9:53 a.m. ·
The EnlightnU Advisor Platform is a personal project of Patrick Ishmael’s, made available to his fellow advisors at EnlightnU Wealth for their work with clients. Please do not share outside the team.
Changes to the platform's tools and calculations, newest first. Version Oct 30, 2026 · 9:53 a.m.
Every Engine plan belongs to a client. Choose one, or start a new client; their plan opens as a scenario you can save and name.
Entered once, on this computer. It fills in presentations, meeting summaries, the Engine's and the Allocation Check's PDFs, and the tax return summary. A client whose record names a different advisor shows that advisor's name without these contact details.
Four strategies, modeled side by side — what you'll spend, what Roth conversions cost and save, and what's left for family.
Pages aren't numbered here since this table of contents is generated before final pagination — sections appear in the order listed above; each is clearly labeled where it begins.
A planning instrument, not a promise
Model four retirement income strategies side by side: what you'll actually spend, what Roth conversions cost and save, and what's left for the people who come after you.
Every figure below assumes your spending target is fully spent each year — there's no requirement to spend it all, and unspent capital could be saved or redirected. The "Combined" row adds nominal spending summed over the whole plan to an inheritance valued at a single future date; it's arithmetically correct but not a discounted, apples-to-apples lifetime-value measure — useful for comparing scenarios against each other, not as a single "true" dollar figure. The "Tax savings vs. Baseline" rows compare each strategy directly to Scenario A, exactly as each is configured above — the real choice on the table, not a hypothetical version of the strategy that doesn't convert. If a strategy's claim ages or spend target also differ from Baseline's, that real difference is included in these figures, not isolated out.
Solid line: while you're alive. Dotted line: the 10 years after — heirs holding the account. Traditional (and any leftover inherited IRA) is drawn down evenly and shown net of the tax heirs actually owe on each year's payout; Roth compounds tax-free the whole time; brokerage is taxed only on its growth since the date of death, since it gets a stepped-up cost basis then.
Compares what Baseline (A) actually pays against what the selected strategy actually pays, exactly as each is configured above — the basis for the "Tax savings vs. Baseline" figures elsewhere on this page, shown year by year instead of as a single lifetime total. Pick a scenario below, or use the Year by year cards further down — switch either one and both update. Continues through the same 10-year heir-hold window as the chart above, since a strategy that costs the household more during their own lifetime can still leave heirs paying meaningfully less — the running total below only tells the full story once both are included.
Bars: that year's difference in tax paid (below the line means the strategy cost more that year; above means it saved). Full-color bars: while you're alive, your own tax. Fainter bars: the 10 years after second death, heirs' tax on whatever Traditional balance remains. Line: the running total across every year so far, through both periods — where it crosses from negative to positive is the point the strategy's cost has fully paid for itself, for the family as a whole.
A narrower, self-contained check per strategy: judged only against what that same money would have faced later via its own future RMDs — independent of the Baseline comparison above. A strategy can show an unfavorable rate here and still show real savings vs. Baseline above (or the reverse); this is about timing, the chart above is about the full real-world comparison.
Every dollar the household itself pays in tax over the whole plan — while both are alive, in whichever calendar year it's actually paid. Federal and state are broken out separately since they're genuinely different line items (and can move independently -- a Roth conversion strategy chosen to optimize federal brackets doesn't automatically optimize a progressive state's brackets too). Capital gains tax (brokerage withdrawals) and Medicare IRMAA surcharges are shown as their own rows since neither is ordinary income tax, even though both are real costs the plan pays. This is lifetime-while-alive only — it doesn't include the heirs' tax figures shown in the legacy section above, which are a separate, later cost paid by different people.
The same "what the plan actually pays" figures as the chart above, split into federal and state instead of compared against Baseline — so a state with its own steep brackets (or none at all) shows up as its own visible layer, not folded into a single tax number. Pick a scenario below. Covers the household's own lifetime only, not the 10-year heir-hold window shown elsewhere -- the federal/state split isn't separately modeled for heirs' own tax, which uses a single flat rate.
Non-spouse heirs must empty an inherited account within 10 years. Traditional dollars are taxed on the way out; Roth dollars never are.
Every year of the plan in one scrollable table, all four strategies side by side. Choose what to view below. Printed below: all three metrics, each on its own page.
This year's assumptions, the Roth conversion, and the actions to take — for whichever scenario you pick. This section runs long by design — use it to check specific years, not necessarily to read straight through.
Every check below starts from the plan as last run and changes one thing; none of them changes the plan. Open one, run it, and its answer stays on the row. Tick “Include in the PDF report” to add it to the report’s What if page.
Each check below starts from the plan in this report and changes one thing, keeping every strategy’s decisions as they are. None of them changes the plan; they show how it holds up.
Shown in full on the Probability Analysis pages earlier in this report.
No what-ifs were selected for this report.
A separate solve with a different priority. The Retirement Engine asks how to pay the least lifetime tax and leave the strongest legacy across four strategies. This check asks one narrower question: how much guaranteed income closes the gap between what the client needs each month and what Social Security and pensions already provide — and how the rest of the assets should sit around that income floor. Because the priorities differ, the two will usually produce different plans. That’s expected, not an error.
Thank you.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to look at your retirement income. This sketch solves one priority — guaranteed income that covers what you need — and is a starting point for the conversation, not a quote, offer, or personalized recommendation. When you're ready, we'll fold it into a full plan that also covers taxes and legacy, and build it together.
Send over your information and we'll follow up to build a real plan together. This opens your email client with everything filled in for you to review — nothing is sent automatically or stored anywhere.
Thank you.
This is a planning illustration, not tax, legal, or investment advice. It assumes flat annual growth (no market volatility), federal tax brackets and IRMAA tiers held at current levels and adjusted only by the inflation rate you set, Traditional balances tracked separately per spouse (RMDs and penalties apply to each spouse's own account and age), and a pooled Roth balance rather than separately tracked spousal Roth accounts.
Review your numbers with a qualified financial advisor and CPA before acting on anything shown here.